As a Conservative Libertarian, my opinion is that Government should only do 3 things: 1) protect my (and my family)person, 2) protect my Property Rights and 3) enforce contracts. I don't want or need the government to do anything else.
With that said, it is clear the "State," government and the police (including the alphabet agencies-FDA, FCC, FTC, USDA, EPA, IRS, etc....) have entirely way too much power. Whether it be the police murdering an unarmed black suspect, or no-knock raids, or swat teams arresting white collar crime suspects at 5 am, there are multiple examples of police abusing their power. Government agencies like the FDA raiding research labs and confiscating documents, computers, lab samples and destroying valuable research. Waco?
What happened to George Floyd should never happen to anyone of any color in this country, period!
What happened to Roger Stone and Gen. Flynn should never happen in this country either.
Cops spraying seated protesters, assaulting peaceful protesters is absolutely wrong and should never happen. Rioters and looters-fair game.
If there is a systemic problem it is not racism, but rather the hunger of absolute power. To be judge, jury and executioner. Maybe too many Dirty Harry movies? This is becoming a more and more serious problem that must be dealt with.
The message of BLM is appropriate to a point. Yes, the media has hyped the white cop killing the black man. It is the classic premise of journalism, if a dog bites a man, no one cares. But if a man bites a dog, it's headline material. Because it is rare and unexpected. Based on actual statistics, a white cop killing a black man is a "man bites dog" scenario. Statistically, it is a very rare event. Yet when it does happen, it becomes national headline news. Don't get me wrong, it should never happen.
BLM and Collin Kaepernick protest the police killing black men, suggesting systemic racism. I get it, and, yes it should be protested. However, if they really cared about "Black Lives" they are going about it completely wrong. Where and how they protest, is not reaching the appropriate target.
A black male victim of homicide is 90 times more likely to be killed by another black male than a white individual. Cops (of all races) kill less than 5% . If BLM really was interested in saving black lives, they should be where the killing actually is taking place. Chicago, D.C., Baltimore, Detroit, etc... I saw someone post a comment on BLM being similar to "Save the Whales." Great cause, but if you do a Save the Whale protest on Lake Michigan, you're missing the target. Unfortunately, BLM protesting where they are, is missing the target.
Here is an interesting paradox. Socialists/leftists are typically the ones most passionate about reigning in the cops and supporting the protests (including the rioters and looters). But in order for their socialist agenda to become a reality, they must have a very powerful police force. Can't have socialism, democratic or otherwise without a strong police force to ensure the socialist agenda is followed. Everyone must conform.
Another issue brought up as part of the "Systemic racism," is the disproportionate number of black incarcerated. My question is, did they commit the crimes? If so, why? Most will point to poverty, poor education, lack of jobs and no male role models for young black males as root causes of higher crime. I agree. If you look back at my previous post on what is oppressing blacks, you will see those oppressors are contributing to higher crime rates. And, yes the justice system is in need of a good cleanse. Rich white people do seem to be getting lighter sentences for more serious crimes. I smell corruption on multiple levels.
We have a lot of problems to fix, but focusing efforts on the wrong targets will not help. As we are seeing, focusing on wrong targets builds resentment and tarnishes the message.
Monday, June 8, 2020
Friday, June 5, 2020
Are Blacks and Other Minorities Oppressed?
The short answer is yes. But probably not how you think they are.
What is Oppression?
Essentially, limiting freedom, restricting or prohibiting activity. When we think of Oppression, we think of slavery, Jim Crowe, segregation, color barriers, ....
If we compare today with the early 1960's, there is a considerable difference in society as a whole with regards to race relations. Are there still issues? Absolutely. There are pockets of racism, but systemic racism is not true.
Slavery, gone for over 150 years. Segregation, gone for well over 50 years.
Do blacks have the same opportunities as whites? Let's look.
Economics; There are plenty of blacks that have succeeded in wealth, CEO's, business owners, etc...
Politics; No poll tax or voter restriction (NO, voter ID does NOT suppress the black vote!!!!). Blacks have been elected to public office for well over 100 years. I even understand we recently had a black president. No oppression in politics.
Sports and Entertainment; Color barrier was broken long ago. Some of the most successful athletes and entertainers are black. No Oppression there.
Advanced Education; Blacks have been openly admitted to colleges and universities for years. And even teach! No Oppression there.
If these people can succeed in society, where is the "Oppression?"
People will point to high incarceration rates for blacks, fear of being stopped by white police officers, and lack of job opportunities.
There is oppression, and here is where it is:
Poor Education due to lack of school choice. Blacks and inner-city youth do not have an opportunity to choose the education they need to compete in the real world. They are stuck in crappy public schools, being taught only what the "State" allows you to know.
This is the number one problem that must be addressed. Why does the left believe black parents are incapable of deciding what is best for their children? Open up school choice,and give these kids a chance to get out of the hood or projects and better themselves!
The poor education leads to poor jobs if any, higher crime, drug use, and single parenthood. Fixing the education problem will make a huge improvement.
Number two, minimum wage. Minimum wage was introduced to keep women and minorities OUT of the workforce. Low and unskilled workers cannot get jobs if the wage is more than the job is worth. Minimum wage keeps entry level workers out of work. No experience is gained, no opportunity occurs.
Number three, dependence on welfare and the inability to get off the system. Can't get a job with growth opportunity, you'll lose your benefit check. Can't get married if a single mom, you'll lose your benefit check,.... The welfare system needs to be revised to give a temporary assist and not punish, but reward those that try to get off the system.
Number four, the Genocide/Eugenics disguised as a "Health Care/Reproductive Care Center." Yep, Planned Parenthood. Founded by the evil maniac Margret Sanger to keep "undesirables (blacks) from reproducing." Abortion is disproportionately done on black women and most Planned Parenthood clinics are in black neighborhoods.
When we look at these four oppressors of the black community, it is evident that the left wants to oppress blacks, as they support and champion these programs. LBJ was right when he finally realized the Civil Rights Bill with the New Deal would give the democrats a vehicle to keep the blacks on the "plantation" and under their control. "We pass this and we'll have those n********s voting democrat for the next 200 years." (Lyndon Johnson-presidential record).
Yes, Oppression still exists, but in the form of democrat policies designed to keep control over the black population. You now know the problem, it can be fixed.
What is Oppression?
Essentially, limiting freedom, restricting or prohibiting activity. When we think of Oppression, we think of slavery, Jim Crowe, segregation, color barriers, ....
If we compare today with the early 1960's, there is a considerable difference in society as a whole with regards to race relations. Are there still issues? Absolutely. There are pockets of racism, but systemic racism is not true.
Slavery, gone for over 150 years. Segregation, gone for well over 50 years.
Do blacks have the same opportunities as whites? Let's look.
Economics; There are plenty of blacks that have succeeded in wealth, CEO's, business owners, etc...
Politics; No poll tax or voter restriction (NO, voter ID does NOT suppress the black vote!!!!). Blacks have been elected to public office for well over 100 years. I even understand we recently had a black president. No oppression in politics.
Sports and Entertainment; Color barrier was broken long ago. Some of the most successful athletes and entertainers are black. No Oppression there.
Advanced Education; Blacks have been openly admitted to colleges and universities for years. And even teach! No Oppression there.
If these people can succeed in society, where is the "Oppression?"
People will point to high incarceration rates for blacks, fear of being stopped by white police officers, and lack of job opportunities.
There is oppression, and here is where it is:
Poor Education due to lack of school choice. Blacks and inner-city youth do not have an opportunity to choose the education they need to compete in the real world. They are stuck in crappy public schools, being taught only what the "State" allows you to know.
This is the number one problem that must be addressed. Why does the left believe black parents are incapable of deciding what is best for their children? Open up school choice,and give these kids a chance to get out of the hood or projects and better themselves!
The poor education leads to poor jobs if any, higher crime, drug use, and single parenthood. Fixing the education problem will make a huge improvement.
Number two, minimum wage. Minimum wage was introduced to keep women and minorities OUT of the workforce. Low and unskilled workers cannot get jobs if the wage is more than the job is worth. Minimum wage keeps entry level workers out of work. No experience is gained, no opportunity occurs.
Number three, dependence on welfare and the inability to get off the system. Can't get a job with growth opportunity, you'll lose your benefit check. Can't get married if a single mom, you'll lose your benefit check,.... The welfare system needs to be revised to give a temporary assist and not punish, but reward those that try to get off the system.
Number four, the Genocide/Eugenics disguised as a "Health Care/Reproductive Care Center." Yep, Planned Parenthood. Founded by the evil maniac Margret Sanger to keep "undesirables (blacks) from reproducing." Abortion is disproportionately done on black women and most Planned Parenthood clinics are in black neighborhoods.
When we look at these four oppressors of the black community, it is evident that the left wants to oppress blacks, as they support and champion these programs. LBJ was right when he finally realized the Civil Rights Bill with the New Deal would give the democrats a vehicle to keep the blacks on the "plantation" and under their control. "We pass this and we'll have those n********s voting democrat for the next 200 years." (Lyndon Johnson-presidential record).
Yes, Oppression still exists, but in the form of democrat policies designed to keep control over the black population. You now know the problem, it can be fixed.
Friday, May 22, 2020
Get Rid of CDC!!!
Why is it, whenever we see a "Public Health Official," they are the most un-healthy looking people I've ever seen. Just because you have a degree in Public Health, doesn't mean you have any clue on what actual health is!
We have an agency known as the CDC, Center for Disease Control, as our supposed government health organization. As the name implies, they are there to "Control" disease. Who's dumb idea is that? You cannot control a virus. You cannot control bacteria. It's like herding cats! You may catch a few, but get bit and scratched in the process. And, most will get away anyways. This is exactly what the CDC policies end up doing. The pathogen gets away and causes damage along the way.
What we need is a paradigm shift. Stop trying to "Control" disease and instead, build HEALTH!
A very important point needs to be made. Understand this; virii and bacteria are NEVER DEADLY!!!!!!!!!!
Read that again, they are NEVER DEADLY!
When people get sick, it is not the virus or bacteria that produces the mucus, fever, coughing, sneezing,etc... Those are your own body's reaction and defense. If your body does not address the invading pathogen properly, death can occur. If pathogens were truly deadly, no one would survive. But, since people do survive, it is the inability of the immune system that caused the death, not the bacteria or virus.
Let's get rid of the CDC and replace it with a Center for Health and Vitality. An organization that promotes immune system strengthening programs. Diet and Nutrition, exercise, natural preventive health care (Massage, Chiropractic, Oriental, Ayurveda, Meditation, etc...), social interaction to start.
We know that all diseases affect those with compromised immune systems. Those are the ones that perish. Healthy people overcome diseases. That is what we must strive for as a society.
I saw the CDC recommendations for schools to re-open. It is absolutely INSANE! Six foot distances, no field trips, no hot lunch, no mass gatherings (pep rallies, assemblies) and others. None of these will prevent any illness. None of these will boost health. In fact, these recommendations will actually harm health. Kids immune systems will be so weakened, that any contact with even a mild cold virus could now be deadly.
The immune system, like any other system in your body needs regular stresses to keep strong. Like training your muscles with the stress of weight lifting. Training your cardio-vascular system with with aerobic activity. Training your brain with puzzles and games. The immune system gets stronger and more efficient when stressed on a regular basis. Coming in daily contact with virii or bacteria trains your immune system.
What happens to your muscles if you just sit around for weeks on end? What happens to your brain if all you do is watch TV? The same thing happens to your immune system if it is not put to use, it becomes weak!
We need to stop trying to "Control" disease, and instead, build our natural immunity up so much that no virus or bacteria can harm anyone. When enough people have done this, that will protect those that cannot via natural herd immunity. That should be our goal!
We have an agency known as the CDC, Center for Disease Control, as our supposed government health organization. As the name implies, they are there to "Control" disease. Who's dumb idea is that? You cannot control a virus. You cannot control bacteria. It's like herding cats! You may catch a few, but get bit and scratched in the process. And, most will get away anyways. This is exactly what the CDC policies end up doing. The pathogen gets away and causes damage along the way.
What we need is a paradigm shift. Stop trying to "Control" disease and instead, build HEALTH!
A very important point needs to be made. Understand this; virii and bacteria are NEVER DEADLY!!!!!!!!!!
Read that again, they are NEVER DEADLY!
When people get sick, it is not the virus or bacteria that produces the mucus, fever, coughing, sneezing,etc... Those are your own body's reaction and defense. If your body does not address the invading pathogen properly, death can occur. If pathogens were truly deadly, no one would survive. But, since people do survive, it is the inability of the immune system that caused the death, not the bacteria or virus.
Let's get rid of the CDC and replace it with a Center for Health and Vitality. An organization that promotes immune system strengthening programs. Diet and Nutrition, exercise, natural preventive health care (Massage, Chiropractic, Oriental, Ayurveda, Meditation, etc...), social interaction to start.
We know that all diseases affect those with compromised immune systems. Those are the ones that perish. Healthy people overcome diseases. That is what we must strive for as a society.
I saw the CDC recommendations for schools to re-open. It is absolutely INSANE! Six foot distances, no field trips, no hot lunch, no mass gatherings (pep rallies, assemblies) and others. None of these will prevent any illness. None of these will boost health. In fact, these recommendations will actually harm health. Kids immune systems will be so weakened, that any contact with even a mild cold virus could now be deadly.
The immune system, like any other system in your body needs regular stresses to keep strong. Like training your muscles with the stress of weight lifting. Training your cardio-vascular system with with aerobic activity. Training your brain with puzzles and games. The immune system gets stronger and more efficient when stressed on a regular basis. Coming in daily contact with virii or bacteria trains your immune system.
What happens to your muscles if you just sit around for weeks on end? What happens to your brain if all you do is watch TV? The same thing happens to your immune system if it is not put to use, it becomes weak!
We need to stop trying to "Control" disease, and instead, build our natural immunity up so much that no virus or bacteria can harm anyone. When enough people have done this, that will protect those that cannot via natural herd immunity. That should be our goal!
Monday, April 13, 2020
Covid and Masks
As we are deep into the Covid (Wuhan) Virus circus, the topic of masks and shortages of masks has come up quite often. Once again, appearance outweighs actual function. Wearing a mask makes it look like you are actually doing something to stop spreading the virus. It is only a false hope.
To explain, we have to start with the reason medical personnel wear masks. Masks were initially worn to keep the DOCTOR from drooling or vomiting in patients during surgery! In other words to protect the patient, not the doctor. This is a very important point. Masks do not prevent the spread of disease to the wearer, but protect those around the wearer.
Virii are very tiny microscopic particles. And if airborne, will easily pass right through even a N95 mask. Luckily, airborne virii are very rare. To be airborne, a virus much "hitch a ride" on some kind of a liquid medium. Mucus, saliva, water vapor, etc... While attached to the liquid, they are easily captured by the mask. So, unless someone directly sneezes at you, wearing a mask is of absolutely no benefit to someone who is not sick.
However, if you are sick, then please, wear a mask!
The mask becomes a passive form of "covering your mouth when you cough." If you are sick, when you cough, breathe or sneeze; the virus will be expelled from your body (part of the initial immune response by the way) on the liquids of the expulsion. Wearing a mask captures those hitch-hiking virii and protects those around you.
When I hear politicians and even worse, medical professionals demand wearing masks to prevent "catching" the virus, I just cringe. How far have we let basic logic and science lapse in our educational system? Again, make it look like we are doing something!
Virii can and do survive on various surfaces. So, gloves, hand washing and avoiding touching your face are very effective ways to keep from catching a virus. Masks are not.
If you are healthy, you do not need a mask. If you are infected, then yes, please wear a mask or stay home.
To explain, we have to start with the reason medical personnel wear masks. Masks were initially worn to keep the DOCTOR from drooling or vomiting in patients during surgery! In other words to protect the patient, not the doctor. This is a very important point. Masks do not prevent the spread of disease to the wearer, but protect those around the wearer.
Virii are very tiny microscopic particles. And if airborne, will easily pass right through even a N95 mask. Luckily, airborne virii are very rare. To be airborne, a virus much "hitch a ride" on some kind of a liquid medium. Mucus, saliva, water vapor, etc... While attached to the liquid, they are easily captured by the mask. So, unless someone directly sneezes at you, wearing a mask is of absolutely no benefit to someone who is not sick.
However, if you are sick, then please, wear a mask!
The mask becomes a passive form of "covering your mouth when you cough." If you are sick, when you cough, breathe or sneeze; the virus will be expelled from your body (part of the initial immune response by the way) on the liquids of the expulsion. Wearing a mask captures those hitch-hiking virii and protects those around you.
When I hear politicians and even worse, medical professionals demand wearing masks to prevent "catching" the virus, I just cringe. How far have we let basic logic and science lapse in our educational system? Again, make it look like we are doing something!
Virii can and do survive on various surfaces. So, gloves, hand washing and avoiding touching your face are very effective ways to keep from catching a virus. Masks are not.
If you are healthy, you do not need a mask. If you are infected, then yes, please wear a mask or stay home.
Saturday, March 9, 2019
North Carolina Study of 675,000 Smokers Finds No Link to Cancer
A recent study modeled after the recently published Danish Vaccine/Autism study, found no link between smoking and cancer.
The North Carolina Study, funded by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company looked at the medical records of 675,000 smokers and compared the rates of cancer to a sub population of 95% smokers. The results were astounding! There was no significant difference in cancer rates between the two groups. Study authors did admit to excluding 11 cancer deaths from the study group, but declined to state why.
The authors were quoted, "This is clear scientific proof that smoking does not cause cancer."
There you have it. Case closed, the Science is Settled!
*if you don't believe this study, but do believe the Danish Study; you have to ask yourself, why?
A recent study modeled after the recently published Danish Vaccine/Autism study, found no link between smoking and cancer.
The North Carolina Study, funded by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company looked at the medical records of 675,000 smokers and compared the rates of cancer to a sub population of 95% smokers. The results were astounding! There was no significant difference in cancer rates between the two groups. Study authors did admit to excluding 11 cancer deaths from the study group, but declined to state why.
The authors were quoted, "This is clear scientific proof that smoking does not cause cancer."
There you have it. Case closed, the Science is Settled!
*if you don't believe this study, but do believe the Danish Study; you have to ask yourself, why?
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Just a Though 2; I know which bathroom I'll use.
There has been a lot of hubbub lately with men who think-self identify as women getting to use the ladies room to do their business. Conservatives in various governing bodies, in an effort to keep perverts out and keep our wives, mothers and children safe from being spied on or assaulted; have passed laws/ordinances making people use the facility in which they are naturally equipped.
Liberal/progressives argue that these laws are anti transgender and discriminatory. They falsely change the narrative of keeping the perverts out, to calling the transgender a pervert.
If the left would pull their heads out of their nether regions long enough to actually hear what the right is saying, maybe we could have a civil discussion on the matter.
Where did all of this start in the first place?
Not in bathrooms!
It was in high school locker rooms.
A couple years ago, a confused (as are most teenage boys, not meant to be condescending) boy, self-identified as a girl. He/she demanded to be allowed to tryout and compete on girls sports teams and make use of the girls locker room. Of course the school board caved in and allowed the boy to join girls sports teams and set up a curtained off area in the girls locker room for him to use.
Can you imagine what these teenage girls will go through having an anatomical male changing in the same room? What about their feelings and security?
From there it expanded to today's mess.
Had no one "Demanded" the right to use a locker room and/or bathroom of their choice, most people would not have really cared. Transgenders, from what I have been told by LGBT friends, have been using the bathroom of their choice for quite some time. And personally, I really don't care.
In fact, I venture to guess that if you asked any conservative their thoughts on the following scenario: If Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner went into the ladies room, entered a stall, closed the door, sat down and did his/her business, washed up and left; would anyone really care? The answer would be no one cares. No one would be threatened by that.
But since the militant LGBT group demands that gender at birth is irrelevant and anyone can use any bathroom they choose; predators have jumped on the bandwagon to their advantage.
Again, no one cares if Bruce/Caitlyn uses the ladies room. We do have a problem with Chester the Molester putting on a wig and skirt to enter a girls locker room. Yes, these sickos will pretend to be transgender to get access to your female family members. I had someone in a Facebook discussion actually ask, "how does one pretend to be transgender?" Being stunned by such a ridiculous statement, I just let it go. I later did think to myself, "how does one pretend to be so stupid?"
Here is my common sense solution that should make everyone happy.
Locker Rooms: If you will be completely exposed/naked then by all means use the facility designated for your anatomical presentation. If you have a penis, use the men's locker room.
Bathrooms: Have 2 separate bathrooms, one with urinals and one with stalls. If you stand, use one room, if you sit use the other. Problem solved.
Liberal/progressives argue that these laws are anti transgender and discriminatory. They falsely change the narrative of keeping the perverts out, to calling the transgender a pervert.
If the left would pull their heads out of their nether regions long enough to actually hear what the right is saying, maybe we could have a civil discussion on the matter.
Where did all of this start in the first place?
Not in bathrooms!
It was in high school locker rooms.
A couple years ago, a confused (as are most teenage boys, not meant to be condescending) boy, self-identified as a girl. He/she demanded to be allowed to tryout and compete on girls sports teams and make use of the girls locker room. Of course the school board caved in and allowed the boy to join girls sports teams and set up a curtained off area in the girls locker room for him to use.
Can you imagine what these teenage girls will go through having an anatomical male changing in the same room? What about their feelings and security?
From there it expanded to today's mess.
Had no one "Demanded" the right to use a locker room and/or bathroom of their choice, most people would not have really cared. Transgenders, from what I have been told by LGBT friends, have been using the bathroom of their choice for quite some time. And personally, I really don't care.
In fact, I venture to guess that if you asked any conservative their thoughts on the following scenario: If Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner went into the ladies room, entered a stall, closed the door, sat down and did his/her business, washed up and left; would anyone really care? The answer would be no one cares. No one would be threatened by that.
But since the militant LGBT group demands that gender at birth is irrelevant and anyone can use any bathroom they choose; predators have jumped on the bandwagon to their advantage.
Again, no one cares if Bruce/Caitlyn uses the ladies room. We do have a problem with Chester the Molester putting on a wig and skirt to enter a girls locker room. Yes, these sickos will pretend to be transgender to get access to your female family members. I had someone in a Facebook discussion actually ask, "how does one pretend to be transgender?" Being stunned by such a ridiculous statement, I just let it go. I later did think to myself, "how does one pretend to be so stupid?"
Here is my common sense solution that should make everyone happy.
Locker Rooms: If you will be completely exposed/naked then by all means use the facility designated for your anatomical presentation. If you have a penis, use the men's locker room.
Bathrooms: Have 2 separate bathrooms, one with urinals and one with stalls. If you stand, use one room, if you sit use the other. Problem solved.
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Just a Thought-Part 1
It has been quite a while since I've posted here, but after reading some of the posts on my Facebook page, there apparently are several uninformed potential voters that need an education.
As you may know, I have retired from Chiropractic practice and have begun a new chapter in my life.
I started a new business restoring old cars and trucks. While getting the business started, I took a job driving school bus. Of course while transporting the kids, my sole focus is on getting them to their destination safely, comfortably and on time. However, when the bus is empty before, between or after route, I get a chance to be alone and do some deep thinking. Here is where I will be sharing these thoughts, hence the title- "Just A Thought."
Of course, please feel free to comment below, just keep it civil or you will be deleted.
Socialism vs Capitalism
I have several friends that "Feel The Bern." They claim "Democratic" Socialism is somehow different than other forms of socialism. Or even worse, claim basic government services as forms of socialism (roads, fire and police, public education). I will give them credit in stating Medicare and Social Security are forms of socialism, as they are. The beauty of that is just look at how those programs are doing. Both are poorly managed and going broke!
They rightly claim that mega corporations (the 1%) have too much power. But they blame Capitalism for their very existence. They falsely believe that the purpose of Capitalism is to screw the little guy for the rich guy's benefit. Wrong!!!!
While I do agree there are mega corporations with too much power, Free Market Capitalism is certainly not the cause. Crony Capitalism is. Once the looney left understands this very principle, maybe they will come to understand Socialism is not the answer.
How did these mega corps get so much power? Certainly not by offering quality products or services that the public demanded. No, they got their power by cozying up to government officials. Getting special breaks not offered to other (competing) businesses or industries. So you can see, Free Market Capitalism is not to blame, government corruption is to blame.
Once government gets involved in a business or industry through taxes, tariffs, or other regulations; creating an advantage to some and a burden on others, you get the problems we have now.
Businesses "Too Big To Fail" (I'll write more on this one later) and other bailouts were wrong. These moves perpetuate and embolden these mega corps to grab even more power.
The Socialist/Progressive Left believes more government intervention is needed. Really? Government intervention caused this crap in the first place, and you want more?
Do you really believe that if we go Socialist, we will all of a sudden live in a fairy tale paradise where big business will pay everyone more than they are worth, give their products and services away so everyone can have them and no one will be rich and powerful.........
Put down the Kool-Aide and pay attention.
What will happen is the crony capitalism will expand. Certain "preferred" businesses will grow while others will be shut down by the government (IRS, EPA, BLM, FTC, FDA, etc....). Those preferred business owners and the politicians in power will run everything, and get even richer in the process. You and I and every other working stiff will happily collect our pittance and crumbs and go on living in this socialist paradise.
Since we have clearly shown the problem began with government intervention, don't you think the way to fix it would be to get the government out of business?
Let the Free Market determine who survives and who fails. Get rid of subsidies, corporate welfare, taxes and tariffs. Cut back on the regulatory power of the above listed alphabet bureaucracies. Free Market Capitalism is based on Fair Exchange for goods and services. Screwing people not only doesn't work, it hurts the business.
The thing to remember from all of this is, Crony Capitalism is not Free Market Capitalism. Socialism expands Crony Capitalism. Let's not go down the failed path of Socialism, democratic or any other.
As you may know, I have retired from Chiropractic practice and have begun a new chapter in my life.
I started a new business restoring old cars and trucks. While getting the business started, I took a job driving school bus. Of course while transporting the kids, my sole focus is on getting them to their destination safely, comfortably and on time. However, when the bus is empty before, between or after route, I get a chance to be alone and do some deep thinking. Here is where I will be sharing these thoughts, hence the title- "Just A Thought."
Of course, please feel free to comment below, just keep it civil or you will be deleted.
Socialism vs Capitalism
I have several friends that "Feel The Bern." They claim "Democratic" Socialism is somehow different than other forms of socialism. Or even worse, claim basic government services as forms of socialism (roads, fire and police, public education). I will give them credit in stating Medicare and Social Security are forms of socialism, as they are. The beauty of that is just look at how those programs are doing. Both are poorly managed and going broke!
They rightly claim that mega corporations (the 1%) have too much power. But they blame Capitalism for their very existence. They falsely believe that the purpose of Capitalism is to screw the little guy for the rich guy's benefit. Wrong!!!!
While I do agree there are mega corporations with too much power, Free Market Capitalism is certainly not the cause. Crony Capitalism is. Once the looney left understands this very principle, maybe they will come to understand Socialism is not the answer.
How did these mega corps get so much power? Certainly not by offering quality products or services that the public demanded. No, they got their power by cozying up to government officials. Getting special breaks not offered to other (competing) businesses or industries. So you can see, Free Market Capitalism is not to blame, government corruption is to blame.
Once government gets involved in a business or industry through taxes, tariffs, or other regulations; creating an advantage to some and a burden on others, you get the problems we have now.
Businesses "Too Big To Fail" (I'll write more on this one later) and other bailouts were wrong. These moves perpetuate and embolden these mega corps to grab even more power.
The Socialist/Progressive Left believes more government intervention is needed. Really? Government intervention caused this crap in the first place, and you want more?
Do you really believe that if we go Socialist, we will all of a sudden live in a fairy tale paradise where big business will pay everyone more than they are worth, give their products and services away so everyone can have them and no one will be rich and powerful.........
Put down the Kool-Aide and pay attention.
What will happen is the crony capitalism will expand. Certain "preferred" businesses will grow while others will be shut down by the government (IRS, EPA, BLM, FTC, FDA, etc....). Those preferred business owners and the politicians in power will run everything, and get even richer in the process. You and I and every other working stiff will happily collect our pittance and crumbs and go on living in this socialist paradise.
Since we have clearly shown the problem began with government intervention, don't you think the way to fix it would be to get the government out of business?
Let the Free Market determine who survives and who fails. Get rid of subsidies, corporate welfare, taxes and tariffs. Cut back on the regulatory power of the above listed alphabet bureaucracies. Free Market Capitalism is based on Fair Exchange for goods and services. Screwing people not only doesn't work, it hurts the business.
The thing to remember from all of this is, Crony Capitalism is not Free Market Capitalism. Socialism expands Crony Capitalism. Let's not go down the failed path of Socialism, democratic or any other.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Flu Shots Available on Every Corner!
It's that time of year again. Media blitz of "Get Your Flu Shot!" Every pharmacy has a little station set up to quickly jab and go. Once again, I just shake my head in utter amazement. Especially this year.
For the first time in flu shot history, the same version of the previous season is being used. One has to wonder, if the shot actually works, why would one have to get it again this year?
A recent study out on Minnesota touted a whopping 60% effectiveness rate. But when you read the study, only 1.5 people out of 100 vaccinated will get the flu. Sounds great, until you read further and find out only 2.5 people out of 100 un-vaccinated will get the flu. In essence, for every 100 shots given out (at over $30 a shot) only one more person will be spared from the flu. (the 1.5/2.5 is where the 60% number comes from)
For the first time in flu shot history, the same version of the previous season is being used. One has to wonder, if the shot actually works, why would one have to get it again this year?
A recent study out on Minnesota touted a whopping 60% effectiveness rate. But when you read the study, only 1.5 people out of 100 vaccinated will get the flu. Sounds great, until you read further and find out only 2.5 people out of 100 un-vaccinated will get the flu. In essence, for every 100 shots given out (at over $30 a shot) only one more person will be spared from the flu. (the 1.5/2.5 is where the 60% number comes from)
Some things to think about:
If the flu shot actually works, it would protect you from 3 specific strains of the flu, that's it. No protection from pneumonia, colds, flu-like illness or any other strain of flu.
While Vit D and healthy living habits will prevent all strains of the flu, pneumonia, colds and flu-like illnesses (with NO side-effects).
The choice is yours (make an informed one). Take your chance with a shot and hope you are the one in one hundred that gets spared the flu, or skip the shot and practice good healthy habits.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Why a Flu Adjustment is better than a Flu Shot
If you follow my Face Book page, you probably have seen me recommend a "Flu Adjustment." So, what is a Flu Adjustment anyway and why should I do this instead of getting the flu shot?
As you will see below, flu shots are not very effective and have serious side effects. While a spinal adjustment boosts your immune system and has no harmful side effects.
To get a better understanding of how to prevent the flu, let's look at flu shots. Flu shots are a combination of 3 strains of seasonal flu, and this year the shot also includes the H1N1 (swine flu) virus. Now understand that the 3 seasonal flu strains are GUESSES! It takes 6 to 9 months to develop and manufacture a vaccine. Government and health agencies guess what the strains will be for the coming flu season. They haven't guessed right yet. Originally, only one strain was included. But, since they couldn't get it right, they boosted their odds by adding additional strains.
Now, for the flu shot to actually give you any benefit, you would have to 1) develop immunity from the shot, 2) be exposed to the specific strain. Then, and only then, will the shot have any beneficial effect.
This year, the H1N1 was added to the regular flu shot. Even though a Canadian study showed those that received the H1N1 shot last year were twice as likely to catch the seasonal flu!
The Flu Shot does NOT protect you from flu strains not included in the vaccine, does NOT protect you from 'Flu Like Illness', colds, intestinal flu, or pneumonia.
Side effects include seizures, fever, pain, convulsions, paralysis and death.
No Benefit, Lots of Risk
A "Flu Adjustment" boosts your immune system to fight off ALL strains of flu, 'flu like illness', colds, intestinal flu, pneumonia, and many other illnesses. Side effects include; improved joint motion, decreased pain, relaxed muscles, better circulation, more energy....
This really is a no-brainer! Add additional Vit D (4-5000 iu per day) and you will have a much healthier winter and beat the flu season.
Any questions, let me know. Please feel free to leave a comment below.
As you will see below, flu shots are not very effective and have serious side effects. While a spinal adjustment boosts your immune system and has no harmful side effects.
To get a better understanding of how to prevent the flu, let's look at flu shots. Flu shots are a combination of 3 strains of seasonal flu, and this year the shot also includes the H1N1 (swine flu) virus. Now understand that the 3 seasonal flu strains are GUESSES! It takes 6 to 9 months to develop and manufacture a vaccine. Government and health agencies guess what the strains will be for the coming flu season. They haven't guessed right yet. Originally, only one strain was included. But, since they couldn't get it right, they boosted their odds by adding additional strains.
Now, for the flu shot to actually give you any benefit, you would have to 1) develop immunity from the shot, 2) be exposed to the specific strain. Then, and only then, will the shot have any beneficial effect.
This year, the H1N1 was added to the regular flu shot. Even though a Canadian study showed those that received the H1N1 shot last year were twice as likely to catch the seasonal flu!
The Flu Shot does NOT protect you from flu strains not included in the vaccine, does NOT protect you from 'Flu Like Illness', colds, intestinal flu, or pneumonia.
Side effects include seizures, fever, pain, convulsions, paralysis and death.
No Benefit, Lots of Risk
A "Flu Adjustment" boosts your immune system to fight off ALL strains of flu, 'flu like illness', colds, intestinal flu, pneumonia, and many other illnesses. Side effects include; improved joint motion, decreased pain, relaxed muscles, better circulation, more energy....
This really is a no-brainer! Add additional Vit D (4-5000 iu per day) and you will have a much healthier winter and beat the flu season.
Any questions, let me know. Please feel free to leave a comment below.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Get Your Golf Game Back
The other day I took my wife to the driving range to hit a bucket of balls. It was an early Thursday afternoon, so we had the place pretty much to ourselves. As we are enjoying the conversation between swings, I hear a strange "VOOM, VOOOM, VOOM" sound. I turn to see a fellow swinging a hollow red plastic tube. Apparently this is some kind of warm-up tool. We finished our bucket and I decided to stick around and watch the other golfers take their hacks. And hack they did.
While I am certainly not a professional golfer, I have spent considerable time and training in evaluating the golf swing and identifying what is physically wrong. I was amazed at the number of swing faults, posture problems and resultant big sweeping slices. The guy who had the red plastic tube, while adequately warmed-up, still had rounded shoulders, bent at the waist and hit every shot to the right with a very nice sweeping slice to really push the ball even further to the right. Of course, I'm now imagining he has a whole closet full of "Training Aids" much like Renee Russo had in the movie Tin Cup.
Let me give you one piece of advice--Skip the training aids! As Paul Callaway, P.T. (first physical therapist on the PGA Tour) said, "The most important piece of equipment is your body."
Just by getting this guy to address the ball with a straight spine angle, bend at the hips (not the waist), his shots would have been a lot straighter.
As a Certified Golf Fitness Professional, I offer physical training programs to take 5-9 strokes off of your game in as little as 6 weeks. If you are interested in the Golf Doctor Programs, give me a call a the office (920) 730-0611. Mention you read this on my blog, and receive the initial swing evaluation for free (regular $145.00 value).
Enjoy the rest of the golf season! And if your game is not what you expected, give me a call.
Please feel free to leave a comment below.
While I am certainly not a professional golfer, I have spent considerable time and training in evaluating the golf swing and identifying what is physically wrong. I was amazed at the number of swing faults, posture problems and resultant big sweeping slices. The guy who had the red plastic tube, while adequately warmed-up, still had rounded shoulders, bent at the waist and hit every shot to the right with a very nice sweeping slice to really push the ball even further to the right. Of course, I'm now imagining he has a whole closet full of "Training Aids" much like Renee Russo had in the movie Tin Cup.
Let me give you one piece of advice--Skip the training aids! As Paul Callaway, P.T. (first physical therapist on the PGA Tour) said, "The most important piece of equipment is your body."
Just by getting this guy to address the ball with a straight spine angle, bend at the hips (not the waist), his shots would have been a lot straighter.
As a Certified Golf Fitness Professional, I offer physical training programs to take 5-9 strokes off of your game in as little as 6 weeks. If you are interested in the Golf Doctor Programs, give me a call a the office (920) 730-0611. Mention you read this on my blog, and receive the initial swing evaluation for free (regular $145.00 value).
Enjoy the rest of the golf season! And if your game is not what you expected, give me a call.
Please feel free to leave a comment below.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Health Care Reform-What They Should Have Done
Well, they went and did it-passed "Health Care Reform." This new law will increase costs and does absolutely nothing to improve health. What should have been done? Here is my proposal:
Using basic economic principles (supply and demand)and understanding that health insurance was never intended to pay for routine care; the following makes sense.
Every person in the U.S. is issued a Health Savings Card (HSC) with a $5000 value. People would contribute pre-tax dollars into their accounts. Lower income people would get govt. grants to fill their accounts (in lieu of tax credits)based on a sliding scale on ability to contribute. This money would be used for routine care and can be used for any health related expense. Any money not used by the end of the year would be transferred to a retirement savings account (interest bearing).
Health insurance would only be for catastrophic illness/injury and would have a $5000 deductible (covered by your HSC). Once you have used up your HSC, the insurance would kick in.
This simple plan reduces costs in several ways. People have control of their health care spending and an incentive to spend wisely. Since they are basically paying with cash, administrative costs for providers will go down. Getting paid at the time of service versus submitting a claim and hoping it gets paid is a no-brainer for doctors. They can lower their costs to the consumer.
By allowing all licensed health care providers to be paid by the HSC, you now have increased the number of providers (increased supply) which also increases competition for your health care dollars. More competition means lower cost.
Other side benefits of this plan include; supplementing retirement (Social Security), reduced health care student loan defaults, and better health education. Since people will have control over their own spending, they will become more educated on staying healthy (prevention) and not waste their own dollars on unnecessary or ineffective treatments.
If you have questions or want more details, leave a comment below.
Using basic economic principles (supply and demand)and understanding that health insurance was never intended to pay for routine care; the following makes sense.
Every person in the U.S. is issued a Health Savings Card (HSC) with a $5000 value. People would contribute pre-tax dollars into their accounts. Lower income people would get govt. grants to fill their accounts (in lieu of tax credits)based on a sliding scale on ability to contribute. This money would be used for routine care and can be used for any health related expense. Any money not used by the end of the year would be transferred to a retirement savings account (interest bearing).
Health insurance would only be for catastrophic illness/injury and would have a $5000 deductible (covered by your HSC). Once you have used up your HSC, the insurance would kick in.
This simple plan reduces costs in several ways. People have control of their health care spending and an incentive to spend wisely. Since they are basically paying with cash, administrative costs for providers will go down. Getting paid at the time of service versus submitting a claim and hoping it gets paid is a no-brainer for doctors. They can lower their costs to the consumer.
By allowing all licensed health care providers to be paid by the HSC, you now have increased the number of providers (increased supply) which also increases competition for your health care dollars. More competition means lower cost.
Other side benefits of this plan include; supplementing retirement (Social Security), reduced health care student loan defaults, and better health education. Since people will have control over their own spending, they will become more educated on staying healthy (prevention) and not waste their own dollars on unnecessary or ineffective treatments.
If you have questions or want more details, leave a comment below.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Olympics-What Makes These Athletes Great
The Winter Olympics are in full swing and the athletes competing are truly showing their incredible skills. How are these athletes able to do the things they do? And even more important, when the difference between a gold medal and 4th place can be less than a second; what separates the winners from the rest?
Like any other athlete; training, conditioning, and diet are vital. Mental preparation becomes an even bigger part of success at this level. But there is a secret weapon many athletes have discovered that allows them to train better, recover from injury better and perform better.
What's the secret? Chiropractic care!
Chiropractic has been officially involved with the Olympics since the 1980 Lake Placid games when Dr. George Goodheart, D.C. was selected as the Team USA's Chiropractor. Since then, every Olympics has had chiropractors on staff treating the Olympic athletes. In fact, this year's USOC medical director is a chiropractor!
How can chiropractic care help these athletes? The chiropractic adjustment basically restores normal joint motion and removes nerve interference. When the joints move normally, the athlete experiences greater flexibility and range of motion, and improved strength. Removing nerve interference improves reflexes, coordination and balance. This gives the athlete that little edge needed to perform at optimal levels.
A study done in the early 1990's showed a 14% improvement in athletic performance when chiropractic care was added to the training program for upper level collegiate athletes. Fourteen percent is a huge number!
A few weeks ago, the NFL announced the 2010 Hall of Fame inductees. Three of the finalists, Roger Craig, Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith have credited chiropractic care for enabling them to play for as long as they did and as well as they did.
In 2008 I attended the Pro Football Chiropractor Association Seminar and had the opportunity to meet several of the chiropractors that work with the NFL teams. Every one stays very busy keeping their players on the field and performing their best.
I also see this in my practice. I serve as team doctor for the Fox Valley Force football team, the Fox Cityz Foxz and Paper Valley Roller Girls Women's Roller Derby Teams. The athletes I treat are the top performers.
Whether you are a weekend warrior or world class athlete, you can improve your performance and lengthen your career by adding chiropractic to your training program. For more information or if you have specific questions, let me know.
As always, please feel free to share this article and be sure to leave a comment below.
Like any other athlete; training, conditioning, and diet are vital. Mental preparation becomes an even bigger part of success at this level. But there is a secret weapon many athletes have discovered that allows them to train better, recover from injury better and perform better.
What's the secret? Chiropractic care!
Chiropractic has been officially involved with the Olympics since the 1980 Lake Placid games when Dr. George Goodheart, D.C. was selected as the Team USA's Chiropractor. Since then, every Olympics has had chiropractors on staff treating the Olympic athletes. In fact, this year's USOC medical director is a chiropractor!
How can chiropractic care help these athletes? The chiropractic adjustment basically restores normal joint motion and removes nerve interference. When the joints move normally, the athlete experiences greater flexibility and range of motion, and improved strength. Removing nerve interference improves reflexes, coordination and balance. This gives the athlete that little edge needed to perform at optimal levels.
A study done in the early 1990's showed a 14% improvement in athletic performance when chiropractic care was added to the training program for upper level collegiate athletes. Fourteen percent is a huge number!
A few weeks ago, the NFL announced the 2010 Hall of Fame inductees. Three of the finalists, Roger Craig, Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith have credited chiropractic care for enabling them to play for as long as they did and as well as they did.
In 2008 I attended the Pro Football Chiropractor Association Seminar and had the opportunity to meet several of the chiropractors that work with the NFL teams. Every one stays very busy keeping their players on the field and performing their best.
I also see this in my practice. I serve as team doctor for the Fox Valley Force football team, the Fox Cityz Foxz and Paper Valley Roller Girls Women's Roller Derby Teams. The athletes I treat are the top performers.
Whether you are a weekend warrior or world class athlete, you can improve your performance and lengthen your career by adding chiropractic to your training program. For more information or if you have specific questions, let me know.
As always, please feel free to share this article and be sure to leave a comment below.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
New Year's Resolution-How's It Going?
Three weeks into the new year, are you on track with any resolutions? One of the more common resolutions is to lose weight. For various reasons, this is a great time to lose weight. Maybe you gained a few too many pounds over Thanksgiving or Christmas. Maybe you have a wedding or reunion coming up this summer and want to WOW everyone. Or maybe you want to look and feel better, or have health concerns about carrying extra pounds.
All are great reasons to lose weight. So, how are you doing?
Many people do great at the start. Watching portions, counting calories, exercising more and getting results. Usually 3-5 pounds the first week, 2-3 the second week, 1-2 pounds the third week. Then it hits. No more weight loss! You may have even gained a few pounds back. How did this happen?
If you get to a plateau, don't worry. This is very normal. As you read further, you will understand why this happened and how to move on.
Plateaus occur during weight loss because your body has become more efficient and you are carrying around a lot less weight. Less weight equals less work for the body. This is, after all the goal of weight loss, to let your body work less. Unfortunately, when you weigh less and work less, you burn fewer calories. Unless you further reduce calorie intake, you will stop losing weight and can put some back on. The other alternative is to increase calorie burning.
After losing 10 pounds, your body burns less calories throughout the day. By adding the weight back on, with a weighted vest or some other way, your body will continue to burn calories like it did 10 pounds ago. To further complicate this, regular exercise induces a training effect. Your body becomes much more efficient at movement. More efficiency equals less work. Less work means fewer calories burned. To combat the training effect, vary your exercise. Intensity, quantity or type of activity must be changed once in a while to reset your body. Doing the same exercise and diet will lead to failure. Not to mention getting very boring very quickly.
So, here is your weight loss tip for the week. Add the pounds you lost back on through external weight. Change your work-out routine intensity or type of exercise. Vary your foods. Much like the training effect of exercise, eating the same can cause your body to ignore the diet and go into a maintain mode. Changing foods will keep your body on a weight loss path.
If you have questions or need help, don't be afraid to ask. I am here to help you. And if I can't help you, I'll find someone who can.
For more information on weight loss, click on the BlogTalkRadio link to the left on Weight Loss. It is a 30 minute presentation on weight loss. Look for Part 2 to be coming in a week or so, as 30 minutes was not enough to cover all the topics of weight loss.
Feel free to e-mail me or call me at the office (920) 730-0611 if you need help losing weight. As always, please leave a comment below.
All are great reasons to lose weight. So, how are you doing?
Many people do great at the start. Watching portions, counting calories, exercising more and getting results. Usually 3-5 pounds the first week, 2-3 the second week, 1-2 pounds the third week. Then it hits. No more weight loss! You may have even gained a few pounds back. How did this happen?
If you get to a plateau, don't worry. This is very normal. As you read further, you will understand why this happened and how to move on.
Plateaus occur during weight loss because your body has become more efficient and you are carrying around a lot less weight. Less weight equals less work for the body. This is, after all the goal of weight loss, to let your body work less. Unfortunately, when you weigh less and work less, you burn fewer calories. Unless you further reduce calorie intake, you will stop losing weight and can put some back on. The other alternative is to increase calorie burning.
After losing 10 pounds, your body burns less calories throughout the day. By adding the weight back on, with a weighted vest or some other way, your body will continue to burn calories like it did 10 pounds ago. To further complicate this, regular exercise induces a training effect. Your body becomes much more efficient at movement. More efficiency equals less work. Less work means fewer calories burned. To combat the training effect, vary your exercise. Intensity, quantity or type of activity must be changed once in a while to reset your body. Doing the same exercise and diet will lead to failure. Not to mention getting very boring very quickly.
So, here is your weight loss tip for the week. Add the pounds you lost back on through external weight. Change your work-out routine intensity or type of exercise. Vary your foods. Much like the training effect of exercise, eating the same can cause your body to ignore the diet and go into a maintain mode. Changing foods will keep your body on a weight loss path.
If you have questions or need help, don't be afraid to ask. I am here to help you. And if I can't help you, I'll find someone who can.
For more information on weight loss, click on the BlogTalkRadio link to the left on Weight Loss. It is a 30 minute presentation on weight loss. Look for Part 2 to be coming in a week or so, as 30 minutes was not enough to cover all the topics of weight loss.
Feel free to e-mail me or call me at the office (920) 730-0611 if you need help losing weight. As always, please leave a comment below.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
The Nightmare Begins-No Cure for Health Care
It is truly amazing that 60 U.S. Senators could support a 2000+ page bill that the vast majority of the population does not want, and haven't even read. Pressure from their leaders and "Pay Backs" should not be the sole reason for passing any legislation.
Hopefully, when this bill goes to conference it will be killed or at least stalled until the November elections. The constitutionality of this bill will/should be tested and hopefully stricken down.
Why is this such a bad bill? As I posted previously, this Health Care Reform Bill does nothing to promote health, reduce costs or improve our system in any way.
The tax and "Mandatory" purchase of insurance will drive the economy even further into recession. Health care will become more expensive and harder to get. Demand will rise (30,000,000+ new consumers) and supply will decrease (up to 30% of current doctors will quit practice or retire early). We are currently in a primary care shortage. Adding 30 million new consumers alone will overrun the system. Over worked Primary Care Providers (PCP's) will be worked even harder to meet the demand. I don't know about you, but when it comes to my health care, I want a doctor that is fresh, well rested, happy and well paid!
Since there will most likely be a public option in this reform, expect insurance companies to go out of business, as they cannot compete against the government. Public plans will most likely be based on a Medicare model which means a drastic cut in doctor and hospital income. Working 60-80 hours per week for a wage less than most factory workers, with potential malpractice liability and student loans pushing $200,000; why would anyone do this?
If doctors can opt out of the program, i.e. not accept insurance and treat patients on a strictly cash basis, many of the top physicians will probably do this. But now you have a situation in which only the "rich" can afford quality care, leaving the poor and middle class depending on the over-worked, under-paid insurance doctors for care.
So, once again, in the infinite wisdom of our federal government, trying to help the poor and uninsured, we may in fact be making the problem worse and increasing costs at the same time.
If you have any questions or comments, please leave below or send me an e-mail directly newcaredoc@aol.com
Hopefully, when this bill goes to conference it will be killed or at least stalled until the November elections. The constitutionality of this bill will/should be tested and hopefully stricken down.
Why is this such a bad bill? As I posted previously, this Health Care Reform Bill does nothing to promote health, reduce costs or improve our system in any way.
The tax and "Mandatory" purchase of insurance will drive the economy even further into recession. Health care will become more expensive and harder to get. Demand will rise (30,000,000+ new consumers) and supply will decrease (up to 30% of current doctors will quit practice or retire early). We are currently in a primary care shortage. Adding 30 million new consumers alone will overrun the system. Over worked Primary Care Providers (PCP's) will be worked even harder to meet the demand. I don't know about you, but when it comes to my health care, I want a doctor that is fresh, well rested, happy and well paid!
Since there will most likely be a public option in this reform, expect insurance companies to go out of business, as they cannot compete against the government. Public plans will most likely be based on a Medicare model which means a drastic cut in doctor and hospital income. Working 60-80 hours per week for a wage less than most factory workers, with potential malpractice liability and student loans pushing $200,000; why would anyone do this?
If doctors can opt out of the program, i.e. not accept insurance and treat patients on a strictly cash basis, many of the top physicians will probably do this. But now you have a situation in which only the "rich" can afford quality care, leaving the poor and middle class depending on the over-worked, under-paid insurance doctors for care.
So, once again, in the infinite wisdom of our federal government, trying to help the poor and uninsured, we may in fact be making the problem worse and increasing costs at the same time.
If you have any questions or comments, please leave below or send me an e-mail directly newcaredoc@aol.com
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Mammograms-New Guidelines
A Federal Government Health Panel recently announced new guidelines for routine mammograms for women between age 40 and 50. The panel now no longer recommends annual screening for women in this age group, as research has not shown any benefit.
This announcement has come under fire by several groups including The American Cancer Society, radiologists, breast surgeons and oncologists (all profit from cancer detection and treatment). They claim routine mammograms save lives and we are "throwing women 40-50 under the bus."
Some pundits have even linked this announcement to the health care debate, here comes the rationing of care. While I am not a supporter of any national health care system, the link is coincidental.
I applaud the panels recommendation! It took a lot of guts to come out against conventional wisdom and finally base a recommendation on actual science. I have been telling my female patients for years in this age group to skip the mammograms until menopause.
Why would I do that?
Because research over the last 5-10 years is showing not only are mammograms for this age group ineffective for detecting cancer, it actually causes cancer in this age group! The National Cancer Institute reported that in younger women, mammograms cause 75 cancers for every 15 detected. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) has risen 328% since mammogram screening began, and 200% is directly linked to the radiation exposure of the mammogram.
A 1992 Canadian National Breast Cancer Study showed mammograms had no positive effect on mortality for women age 40-50. In fact the study suggested women in this age group were more likely to die of breast cancer when screened regularly.
A 2008 study published in the AMA's Archives of Internal Medicine showed marked increases in cancer rates since the onset of regular screening. But even more astounding is they found many of the cancers detected by mammograms spontaneously regressed!
Mammograms done on pre-menopausal women have a very high incidence of false positive tests, which leads to unnecessary treatment, and stress. There is also a very high incidence of false negative results, meaning many cancers go undetected. For every cancer detected, 4 are missed.
This is a very emotional topic, and tempers can flare when discussing this issue. You will hear of women in their 40's that had their cancer detected by mammograms and claim their life was saved. But when you look at the statistics, yes she was saved, but four other women now have cancer because of the mammogram, three others had false negative tests and 70 women were told they have cancer when they didn't.
The women who survives, should be thankful, and at the same time keep the other 77 women whose lives were adversely affected by mammograms in their prayers.
Monday, November 2, 2009
Chronic Illness Running Rampant!
With the main focus in the news lately on infectious disease, H1N1, seasonal flu, pneumonia....And of course Breast Cancer all last month, (and the national health care debate) one truly serious health issue keeps getting pushed aside. Chronic Illness!
Chronic Degenerative Illness including diabetes, obesity, arthritis, fibromyalgia, Celiac, Chron's, thyroid dysfunction, lupus, RA, Alzheimers, etc...... is the third leading cause of death behind heart disease and cancer. And virtually all of these diseases are preventable.
In the next ten years, one in three will be diagnosed with Type II Diabetes, two of three will be obese....before age 20! We are slowly killing our children.
All of these chronic illnesses have one thing in common--Inflammation.
Inflammation that can lead to advanced aging, degeneration, allergies, pain, heart disease, cancer and death.
Causes of inflammation include; acute illness, injuries, vaccines, diet and stress. The simplest way to reduce and eliminate inflammation is with diet changes. The SAD (Standard American Diet) is the biggest culprit in the rapid decline in our health. High in sugar (simple carbs), Omega 6 fats (vegetable oils), low in fiber and essential nutrients. Sugars (sucrose, fructose, HFCS) inhibit immune response, over tax insulin production and cause inflammation. The ratio of Omega 3 to Omega 6 oils should be 1:1 or 1:2. The SAD ratio is 1:20! This unbalanced ratio of fat types increases inflammation.
The inflammation over time degrades the digestive tract as well. This leads to leaky gut and eventually allergies and of course more inflammation. Nasty Cycle!
To reduce inflammation follow these steps:
1)Start Moving! Simple exercise on a regular basis reduces inflammation
2)cut out-ELIMINATE- sugars, grains and starches from your diet (corn is a grain)
3)eat more fish 3-4 times per week and take a quality Omega 3 supplement
4)eat more fresh vegetables (a pound per day)
5)eat 5 colors of fruits and vegetables per day (cup of blueberries per day is a great start)
6)get adjusted! Adding motion to the spinal joints reduces pain and inflammation
7)reduce stress-meditate
If you suffer from chronic illness or have family members suffering, get checked by someone familiar with Functional Medicine. Many chronic illnesses can be detected years before symptoms appear. But you have to know where to look.
Any questions, give me a call. And as always, please leave a comment.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Top Athletes Embrace Chiropractic
High Level Athletes
of All Ages
Embrace Chiropractic Care
Four time Olympic silver medalist doctor Terry Schroeder has just returned from the Water Polo World Championships in Rome, Italy. Their fourth place finish was the best finish by the USA Water Polo Team ever in the World championships and they have proven that their silver medal run in Beijing was no fluke. With Dr. Schroeder as their coach and the entire team under chiropractic care they are on target for a gold medal in 2012. High level athletes in nearly every sport have chosen to make chiropractic care a part of their training and a part of their lifestyle.
Dr. Jeff Spencer was the team chiropractor for the USA Cycling Team that won 7 Tour de France victories. Dr. Greg Kempf from Cleveland, Ohio has been providing chiropractic care for the Cleveland Browns since 1999 and the Cavaliers for the past five seasons. On game day it is not uncommon for Dr. Kempf to adjust 35 of the 55 members of the team prior to the game including their highest profile players.
The trend toward chiropractic care caught on widely at the Olympics. Athletes are more and more aware of the edge others were receiving and they flock to the care so as not to lose out on any natural advantage. Today a chiropractor is in charge of the medical unit.
The trickle down to youth sports programs is very exciting as more and more high level athletes of all ages are embracing chiropractic care. Ambush Elite Youth Soccer Team, a Georgia affiliate of West Ham United of the English Premier League whose under 17 soccer team
is currently ranked 8th in the nation, receives chiropractic care before every game. At one time they were ranked second. Their coach, David Eristavi, one of the premier your soccer coaches in the country, believes that all young athletes should have chiropractic care as a part of their training.
Youth sports programs around the country are making chiropractic care available to all of their athletes. It’s not just the guys, it’s the women as well. Kerry Walsh, the two time Olympic gold medalist in volleyball, told me in a recent interview for The 100 Year Lifestyle Workout book that the balance of these three elements of the ESS, Endurance, Strength and Structure, are an important factor in her training and her success. Her workouts on the court are cardiovascular and build her endurance. Off the court she does Pilates, plyometrics, and strength-training that gives her the added punch she needs for an overhead spike. She also takes care of her structure through chiropractic care and other holistic techniques to balance her spine and keep her muscles strong and flexible. Kerri considers the structural element of her fitness routine to be an important factor that separates her from the pack.
Jerry Rice, the spokesperson for the Foundation of Chiropractic Progress Campaign, “I did a lot of things to stay in the game but regular visits to my chiropractor were among the most important.”
If you are an athlete who wants the competitive edge, or who is injured and wants to recover quickly, chiropractic care can give you the edge you are seeking.
*From Dr. Eric Plasker, D.C.*
of All Ages
Embrace Chiropractic Care
Four time Olympic silver medalist doctor Terry Schroeder has just returned from the Water Polo World Championships in Rome, Italy. Their fourth place finish was the best finish by the USA Water Polo Team ever in the World championships and they have proven that their silver medal run in Beijing was no fluke. With Dr. Schroeder as their coach and the entire team under chiropractic care they are on target for a gold medal in 2012. High level athletes in nearly every sport have chosen to make chiropractic care a part of their training and a part of their lifestyle.
Dr. Jeff Spencer was the team chiropractor for the USA Cycling Team that won 7 Tour de France victories. Dr. Greg Kempf from Cleveland, Ohio has been providing chiropractic care for the Cleveland Browns since 1999 and the Cavaliers for the past five seasons. On game day it is not uncommon for Dr. Kempf to adjust 35 of the 55 members of the team prior to the game including their highest profile players.
The trend toward chiropractic care caught on widely at the Olympics. Athletes are more and more aware of the edge others were receiving and they flock to the care so as not to lose out on any natural advantage. Today a chiropractor is in charge of the medical unit.
The trickle down to youth sports programs is very exciting as more and more high level athletes of all ages are embracing chiropractic care. Ambush Elite Youth Soccer Team, a Georgia affiliate of West Ham United of the English Premier League whose under 17 soccer team
is currently ranked 8th in the nation, receives chiropractic care before every game. At one time they were ranked second. Their coach, David Eristavi, one of the premier your soccer coaches in the country, believes that all young athletes should have chiropractic care as a part of their training.
Youth sports programs around the country are making chiropractic care available to all of their athletes. It’s not just the guys, it’s the women as well. Kerry Walsh, the two time Olympic gold medalist in volleyball, told me in a recent interview for The 100 Year Lifestyle Workout book that the balance of these three elements of the ESS, Endurance, Strength and Structure, are an important factor in her training and her success. Her workouts on the court are cardiovascular and build her endurance. Off the court she does Pilates, plyometrics, and strength-training that gives her the added punch she needs for an overhead spike. She also takes care of her structure through chiropractic care and other holistic techniques to balance her spine and keep her muscles strong and flexible. Kerri considers the structural element of her fitness routine to be an important factor that separates her from the pack.
Jerry Rice, the spokesperson for the Foundation of Chiropractic Progress Campaign, “I did a lot of things to stay in the game but regular visits to my chiropractor were among the most important.”
If you are an athlete who wants the competitive edge, or who is injured and wants to recover quickly, chiropractic care can give you the edge you are seeking.
*From Dr. Eric Plasker, D.C.*
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Slippery Slope
The long arm of government intrusion in our lives, especially health care, keeps getting longer. In New York, health care workers are REQUIRED to get the flu shot or lose their jobs. They have no choice, rights stripped away! Health officials now have authority to quarantine and force vaccination in case of an outbreak. There are no specific definitions of an "outbreak."
But what really bothers me is the recent conviction of a couple in the Wausau area for reckless homicide of their 11 year old daughter. The girl had undiagnosed diabetes and the parents chose to treat her with prayer. The girl died and the parents were prosecuted for neglecting their child.
Reports state the illness is very treatable, thus the dilemma.
While I do not agree the parents made the right choice in type of treatment, but who am I to dictate what treatment these parents must choose. Or anyone else (especially the government) for that matter. It is unfortunate that the child died, but should the parents have been prosecuted?
I say no. And here is why:
The parents in this case did not ignore their child. They chose to actively treat her with prayer. The treatment failed. Had these parents gone the conventional path and treated her with medicine, and the child had a reaction and died, would they be prosecuted as well? Of course not. But why the double standard? If a medical treatment causes a death, the provider can be sued for malpractice, but no one would charge the parent with reckless behavior.
The underlying problem is medical treatment is being sanctioned as the only treatment acceptable for illness. If you don't get treated medically, and death occurs, you will be prosecuted for not using "State Approved" care. (Minnesota boy with leukemia being forced to undergo chemotherapy)
While the death of this child is tragic, the loss of personal freedom to choose the type of health care best for you is more tragic. These parents chose poorly, but not criminally. What is criminal is forced vaccination, giving mercury laced flu shots to pregnant mothers, and preventing truthful information on natural and alternative treatments to be given to the public.
A one year old recently died following a flu shot. The child had seizures after getting the 6 month vaccines, and died after getting the flu shot. Are these parents going to be convicted of reckless homicide for killing their child? They knew the child had a poor reaction to vaccines in the past, yet their child was injected again (against their wishes) and died. Since it was a medical procedure that failed, it is just a tragedy. Besides, the official report will claim it was just a coincidence anyway.
Don't give up your rights! Support freedom of choice in health care. Remember, the number one cause of preventable death in the U.S. is not cancer or heart disease, it is medicine (errors, prescription drug interactions, surgery...). Medicine kills over 250,000 people every year!
But what really bothers me is the recent conviction of a couple in the Wausau area for reckless homicide of their 11 year old daughter. The girl had undiagnosed diabetes and the parents chose to treat her with prayer. The girl died and the parents were prosecuted for neglecting their child.
Reports state the illness is very treatable, thus the dilemma.
While I do not agree the parents made the right choice in type of treatment, but who am I to dictate what treatment these parents must choose. Or anyone else (especially the government) for that matter. It is unfortunate that the child died, but should the parents have been prosecuted?
I say no. And here is why:
The parents in this case did not ignore their child. They chose to actively treat her with prayer. The treatment failed. Had these parents gone the conventional path and treated her with medicine, and the child had a reaction and died, would they be prosecuted as well? Of course not. But why the double standard? If a medical treatment causes a death, the provider can be sued for malpractice, but no one would charge the parent with reckless behavior.
The underlying problem is medical treatment is being sanctioned as the only treatment acceptable for illness. If you don't get treated medically, and death occurs, you will be prosecuted for not using "State Approved" care. (Minnesota boy with leukemia being forced to undergo chemotherapy)
While the death of this child is tragic, the loss of personal freedom to choose the type of health care best for you is more tragic. These parents chose poorly, but not criminally. What is criminal is forced vaccination, giving mercury laced flu shots to pregnant mothers, and preventing truthful information on natural and alternative treatments to be given to the public.
A one year old recently died following a flu shot. The child had seizures after getting the 6 month vaccines, and died after getting the flu shot. Are these parents going to be convicted of reckless homicide for killing their child? They knew the child had a poor reaction to vaccines in the past, yet their child was injected again (against their wishes) and died. Since it was a medical procedure that failed, it is just a tragedy. Besides, the official report will claim it was just a coincidence anyway.
Don't give up your rights! Support freedom of choice in health care. Remember, the number one cause of preventable death in the U.S. is not cancer or heart disease, it is medicine (errors, prescription drug interactions, surgery...). Medicine kills over 250,000 people every year!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)